Evolution is the process of natural development. Whether a dog or perhaps a car, we are permanently trying to improve on the prior model. Most progress is gradual, interrupted once in some time by way of a major breakthrough, like walking on two legs or ABS brakes.
Just how is it that the human race, which is clearly the top of food chain, still needs the best element of per year when expecting? Especially if you think about that individuals usually only produce one, rather than a litter, let alone eggs by the hundreds. Haven’t we advanced sufficiently by the 21st century to have the ability to cut this right down to less than half a year?
Evidently we have not, which raises the question, you will want to? It will be easy to put the blame on the women. Pregnancy is their job after all. But seeing as they got this all-important role because the men couldn’t be trusted with it, we’re hardly in a position to point the finger.
So what’s the answer? There really can only be one logical conclusion. Pregnancy and childbirth take nine months because that’s just how long people need to choose a name. Let’s face it. Other species of animals get the birth process over with a lot quicker because they don’t really even bother, unless they’re a Disney character.
Our history has shown us that it can take a long time to come up with a sensible name, so a baby might as well remain in the womb until we do. In reality, there are many examples that suggest nine months still isn’t good enough and we have to extend it to a year. Just look at all the kids inventively called Junior, or Bob Smith III. It’s an admission that if three-quarters of per year, that’s the best they could manage.
The initial hurdle is relatives. This is specially true for younger parents, who tend to have more of these alive, most of whom desire to be immortalized by their grandchild inheriting their name. So unless you’re having quadruplets, you’ve got a challenge حوامل.You can’t even break free with giving your son or daughter all four names, because only it’s possible to come first and top billing counts for everything. Next is the issue of the particular names grandparents often have. It appears children’s names were a low priority when confronted with the industrial revolution and the odd World War. Who would like to wind up calling the youngster Algernon or Gertrude?
The following problem can be your wife’s side of the family. Whether a lady took her husband’s name in matrimony, she will likely want her family name to survive, so it becomes a child’s middle name, even if it isn’t one at all. Just ask Mary Carbunkle Jones.
The only exception is if these people are extremely rich. If calling your daughter Ethelred Stinkpants Smith puts her to the the top of inheritance heap, then so be it.
Next comes the issue of pets. Not naming them, as that’s easy and they don’t really care anyway. The only principle is to consider that maybe you are in the park one day shouting at your puppy, so names like “Fatty” and “Loser” are negative choices.
The issue is that you can’t name your son or daughter after a pet. You might just like the name Max, but when an uncle had a Doberman called Max, it’s only not going to happen. Charlie is a great choice for either gender — except when someone had a cat of the same designation that got run over. It’s like by choosing that name, you’re condemning your son or daughter to a fate of jumping out of a screen, chasing a bird and getting hit by way of a truck.
If anything, choosing a name must be easier now. These days, most situations is acceptable. If you can’t find a real name you want, then think about circumstances, a nation or perhaps a continent? A food-group will do. But regardless of the infinite choice, it’s amazing just how many parents mess up. They don’t really think what sort of child’s name may be changed, shortened or generally twisted into something which will scar their psyche for life. How hard was school for famous brands Jeremy Attric, Philip Ness and Frank Ukwit? Who knows, perhaps if he hadn’t been called Adolf, things could have been different.